Quantcast
Channel: CPA Exam Review Forum » Topic: NINJA MCQ Trending Score vs. Actual Exam
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1393

xkc5 on "NINJA MCQ Trending Score vs. Actual Exam"

$
0
0

First CPA Exam ever, so much love for this product

FAR
Total Attempts: 4,729
Total Time: 49:17
Average Score 58%
Trending Score 82%

Actual: 84

Did not hit Review (91%). MCQ was my key to victory as was the Audio 30 min./day. Used CPAExcel and got 92% completion and exactly 3 days of time in that program, so I was right at the 120hr study time "benchmark" when considering MCQ (excl. Ninja Audio). Also I was trending at 84 the night before the exam, and then I took a 30 question adaptive lesson for the fun of it before driving off in the AM and it knocked me down 1.6% haha.

3 out of 5 of my non-research SIMS were like nothing I'd studied or considered in format or content even after practicing 75% of the SIMs in MCQ as well as all the CPAExcel examples. Believe what everyone says here, Ninja MCQ is much closer to the exam MCQs, but CPAExcel is a deeper dive into each lesson, which to me should help more on SIMS.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 1393

Trending Articles